Big Tech PE Ratios vs Pre-Pandemic Earnings

avatar

The Most Important Thing

risk is largely a matter of opinion

Sam Mendoza's profile picture on Select App
SM

Sam Mendoza

路4 years ago
shared a media post in group #The Most Important Thing
Big tech valuations. Are they cheap? Here is what the PE looks like if earnings revert back to prepandemic looking at TTM EPS prior to covid lockdowns and helicopter money, assuming earnings compression come into effect msft at current share price of $225 would have 37.5 PE with EPS of $6 per share googl at current share price of $97 would have 38.8 PE with EPS of $2.5 per share aapl at current share price of $139 would have 43.4 PE with EPS of $3.2 per share meta at current share price of $128.5 would have a 17.6 PE with EPS of $7.3 per share people tunnel vision on PE and stock price, often forgetting the second part of the equation which is the E is for Earnings
聽
avatar

Sam Mendoza

Because doom and gloom. The last three years of earnings growth with be lost and then it will be basically flat forever. The pandemic didn't accelerate trends it introduced temporary bubbles that are now bursting. Is MSFT is hugely over, not underpriced?

聽
avatar

Jerome Cody

My question is why would massive cloud c...
Cloud customers are cutting expenses. They use less expensive options wherever possible, rent less powerful VMs, use slower storage, and otherwise optimize costs on their end. On top of that, if economic activity goes down, clients naturally use less cloud services. Walmart does not need as much capacity as during peak pandemic, if people are buying less. They scale down until demand returns and pay less. Data centers are not that different from factories. If there are no orders, you get no money, but still need to spend to maintain the facilities. And maintenance became more expensive due to inflation, higher energy costs and supply shortages, cutting into profits. Sales are global and strengthening dollar cuts into profits too, because contracts are typically set in local currencies over a long period of time. European customers pay the same amount in euros as before, but revenue in dollars is down 20% over a single year. Top cloud providers will still be highly profitable, but profits will probably go down across the board and we might even see seemingly never-ending growth finally stalling. Btw, Google never made any money on its cloud. It was a continuous loss due to high capital investments, late entry, and small market share. And now it's going to get even worse for them. Google has money to weather this out, but smaller and niche players are in trouble.

聽
avatar

D J

My question is why would massive cloud c...
Because the size of a company鈥檚 need for access to cloud architecture is based on their employee size and avg users resource needs. While the needs per user will most likely stay near static I see a major slowing to its growth and many parts of tech are still priced for this growth. Add in layoffs equaling less users and we will see major revisions to forward PE. Thats just one example. Plenty of headwinds out there.

Embed post to a webpage :
<div data-postid="vbeq" [...] </div>
Powered bySelect路iOS路Android
Privacy|Terms|